1984 by George Orwell


Title: 1984
Series: N/A
Author: George Orwell
Genre: Science Fiction, Classic Literature
Release Date: 1949
Format Read: Paperback
Pages: 328


“Back of Book” Summary:

Written in 1948, 1984 was George Orwell’s chilling prophecy about the future. And while the year 1984 has come and gone, Orwell’s narrative is timelier than ever. 1984 presents a startling and haunting vision of the world, so powerful that it is completely convincing from start to finish. No one can deny the power of this novel, its hold on the imaginations of multiple generations of readers, or the resiliency of its admonitions. A legacy that seems only to grow with the passage of time.

My Review:

Reality control: who controls the present, controls the past.

1984 was a book I could barely put down. It really was a quick read even with all the vernacular of ‘Newspeak’.  Unlike, The Catcher in the Rye, I can definitely see why this book is a literary favorite. The book left me with several unanswered questions, such as: what happened to Julia while in the Ministry of Love, and why did O’Brien, who knew of their forbidden thoughts and love affair, string them along for so long before arresting them? Quite possibly the answer to the later question is that once Winston reach complete rehabilitation from his mental illness (that is of not embracing the party) that he no longer cared, and thus the narrator felt it of no importance to answer those lingering questions.

The world of Oceania was absolutely terrifying. A totalitarian dictatorship that could never die. To control history is to control everything. Even today the media and sometimes politicians try to alter history for their own agendas or to give legitimacy to their authority. The sad reality is that many people accept this new truth and don’t check facts. “Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious” (p. 70). Objectivity is a virtue.

It was thought that the proletarians were kept on the brink of poverty and hunger and therefore would be too busy working and trying to survive to rebel. It was the party members, who of anyone in society, might awake to the party’s dishonesty and manipulation. It was after all they that were actually doing the manipulating (i.e. Winston Smith’s job was to alter old newspapers to make sure nothing the party said or predicted was ever wrong).

This section of Goldstein’s book was rather chilling:

In the crucial years, the fact that the Party was not a hereditary body did a great deal to neutralize opposition. The older kind of Socialist, who had been trained to fight against something called ‘class privilege’ assumed that what is not hereditary cannot be permanent. He did not see that the continuity of an oligarchy need not be physical, nor did he pause to reflect that hereditary aristocracies have always been shortlived, whereas adoptive organizations such as the Catholic Church have sometimes lasted for hundreds or thousands of years. The essence of oligarchical rule is not father-to-son inheritance, but the persistence of a certain world-view and a certain way of life, imposed by the dead upon the living. A ruling group is a ruling group so long as it can nominate its successors. The Party is not concerned with perpetuating its blood but with perpetuating itself. Who wields power is not important, provided that the hierarchical structure remains always the same.

All the beliefs, habits, tastes, emotions, mental attitudes that characterize our time are really designed to sustain the mystique of the Party and prevent the true nature of present-day society from being perceived. Physical rebellion, or any preliminary move towards rebellion, is at present not possible. From the proletarians nothing is to be feared. Left to themselves, they will continue from generation to generation and from century to century, working, breeding, and dying, not only without any impulse to rebel, but without the power of grasping that the world could be other than it is. They could only become dangerous if the advance of industrial technique made it necessary to educate them more highly; but, since military and commercial rivalry are no longer important, the level of popular education is actually declining. What opinions the masses hold, or do not hold, is looked on as a matter of indifference. They can be granted intellectual liberty because they have no intellect. In a Party member, on the other hand, not even the smallest deviation of opinion on the most unimportant subject can be tolerated.

A Party member lives from birth to death under the eye of the Thought Police. Even when he is alone he can never be sure that he is alone. Wherever he may be, asleep or awake, working or resting, in his bath or in bed, he can be inspected without warning and without knowing that he is being inspected (p 209-210).

A lengthy quote, but frightening. Orwell thoroughly explains the ruling party’s political ideology. Don’t modern times/governments have some eerily similar practices/policies? This is why 1984 will never fade.

Will we ever be charged with thought crimes in this country for thinking an unpopular thought?

The narrator leads us to believe that once thought criminals have been healed of their mental illnesses that they will subsequently be exterminated. At the end of the book, Winston Smith is released from prison. However, once he truly loves Big Brother, it is uncertain if he was actually killed or let live and that death was only a threat. During confinement Winston believed he would never betray himself. “But if the object was not to stay alive but to stay human, what difference did it ultimately make? They could not alter your feelings; for that matter you could not alter them yourself, even if you wanted to. They could lay bare in the utmost detail everything that you had done or said or thought; but the inner heart, whose workings were mysterious even to yourself, remained impregnable” (p. 167).  And even though at the end of the book Winston admits to loving Big Brother, at the same moment he almost hoped Oceania would lose the war and be invaded, leading to the destruction of the party. Winston’s heart had not changed, but upon hearing of victory it was clear that nothing would ever change. The party would always prevail and that the rules of war would never change. There would be no political shifts and to spend time thinking otherwise would just lead to despair. O’Brien admitted to have written the “brotherhood’s” book under the pen name Goldstein called The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism. At first I was confused as to why he would have written it and let Smith read it. I think it was to convince Winston that the government was so complex, yet sturdy, and rebellion was almost impossible. The obvious objective was to dissuade him from continuing his anti-party thought-crimes. I think this was all a part of the rehabilitation. Although Winston never completely lost the rebellious feelings in his heart, he was still utterly defeated by O’Brien and gave into party manipulation to appease his pain- and not only physical pain but more importantly his mental anguish.

How much would our society agree to for peace of mind? The answer is probably scarier than anyone wants to admit

1984 is a science fiction classic. This is a must read. I guarantee this book will leave you with many things to consider and think about long after it’s finished. I leave you with the Ministry of Truth’s iconic slogan:



Saxons, Vikings, and Celts by Bryan Sykes


Title: Saxons, Vikings, and Celts: The Genetic Roots of Britain and Ireland
Series: N/A
Author: Bryan Sykes
Genre: Non-Fiction
Release Date: 2006
Format Read: Hardcover
Pages: 320


“Back of Book” Summary:

Saxons, Vikings, and Celts is the most illuminating book yet to be written about the genetic history of Britain and Ireland. Through a systematic, ten-year DNA survey of more than 10,000 volunteers, Bryan Sykes has traced the true genetic makeup of British Islanders and their descendants. This historical travelogue and genetic tour of the fabled isles, which includes accounts of the Roman invasions and Norman conquests, takes readers from the Pontnewydd cave in North Wales, where a 300,000-year-old tooth was discovered, to the resting place of “The Red Lady” of Paviland, whose anatomically modern body was dyed with ochre by her grieving relatives nearly 29,000 years ago. A perfect work for anyone interested in the genealogy of England, Scotland, or Ireland, Saxons, Vikings, and Celts features a chapter specifically addressing the genetic makeup of those people in the United States who have descended from the British Isles.

My Review:

I have introduced you to a new art and a new language. An art that is written in the codes of our DNA, those unseen architects of our bodies, even of our souls (p 278).

This is the first book I’ve read by Oxford Geneticist Bryan Sykes, but it won’t be the last. I am not an expert in genetics, but I have enough knowledge of it to see how much Sykes “dumbed down” the scientific jargon for most people to follow along such a complex topic. Instead of focusing solely on genetic science, Sykes concentrated on the history of the British Isles and the people who migrated to it. He spoke quite often of his previous book The Seven Daughters of Eve throughout the text (which I have yet to read). He discovered a genetic link between all Europeans that traces back to seven major and several minor genealogical clans that we can all be grouped into based on our Mitochondrial DNA (about the same number of paternal clans for European men and about 36 clans worldwide for woman and 17 for men). He spent a great deal of effort trying to express just how amazingly philosophical this finding actually is. Below is a lengthy quote that stuck out to me as the best way to explain how genetic science and story telling narrative styles have been combined by Sykes.

The process is repeated generation after generation after generation. Nuclear DNA comes from the father and mother, mDNA only from the mother. Consider your own mDNA for a moment. It is powering your aerobic metabolism is ever cell — from the cells in your retina which collect the focused image from the page, to the muscles in your arm that turn the pages, to the cells that are burning fuel to keep you warm. All these functions are controlled by your mDNA which, because of its unusual inheritance, you have got only from your mother. Who got it from her mother. Who got it from her mother and so on. At any time in the past, be it 100, 1000, even 10,000 years ago, there was only one woman alive at the time from whom you inherited you mDNA. Even though I have known this for years it still amazes me to think about it (p 98).

Dr. Sykes claims that most inhabitants of the British Isles and Ireland share common ancestors that arrived in England between 6,000-10,000 years ago. He details their migration around the Mediterranean and the Iberian Peninsula, through France and across the Channel to England. He says he found virtually no difference between Celtic and Pict genetics and these lines make up most of the blood of the Isles. Sykes says he found very little difference between Norman, Viking, and Saxon which meant that he couldn’t differentiate the exact group from DNA, but that the common link between them has left a mark on the British blood. Obviously from invasions. He found traces of Roman blood, but very little. The conclusion is that most people in the British Isles, including Ireland, are to this day made of the same common stock of ancient Celtic blood, even despite all the invasions.

Bryan Sykes runs a website http://www.oxfordancestors.com/ that offers DNA testing for the purposes of learning about ones ancestors. It is rather expensive, actually more than other similar DNA tests. However, if you go through Oxford Ancestors he will match you with a clan mother, your family’s “Mitochondrial Eve”. This is something I would like to do one day. Although I cannot afford several hundred dollars for his services, I can afford to read his other books.

If you are looking for an in-depth, data-filled, scientific-jargon containing genetic study of Britain and Ireland this particular book may disappoint you. This book is recommended for those interested in the overall picture of this region’s genetic origins with the addition of history, myth, and narrative storyline weaved through basic genetic discussion (to those not very familiar with genetics it will most likely be a good introduction into the topic). I personally love the combination of scientific jargon with storytelling narrative because it allows readers to better visualize just how phenomena affects their lives. Genetics may be obscure to some people until they are encouraged to think about how even the ancestors they’ve never even imagined have passed on the genes that have made them what they are today. I highly recommend this book to those interested in British and Irish genetics.

Shadows of War by Carolyn Nordstrom


Title: Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century
Series: N/A
Author: Carolyn Nordstrom
Genre: Non-Fiction
Release Date: 2004
Format Read: Paperback
Pages: 306

“Back of Book” Summary:

In this provocative and compelling examination of the deep politics of war, Carolyn Nordstrom takes us from the immediacy of war-zone survival, through the offices of power brokers, to vast extra-legal networks that fuel war and international profiteering. She captures the human face of the front lines, revealing both the visible and the hidden realities of war in the twenty-first century. Shadows of War is grounded in ethnographic research carried out at the epicenters of political violence on several continents. Its pages are populated not only with the perpetrators and victims of war but also with the scoundrels, silent heroes, and average families who live their lives in the midst of explosive violence. War reconfigures our most basic notions of humanity, Nordstrom demonstrates. This book, of crucial importance at the present moment, shows that war is enmeshed in struggles over the very foundations of the sovereign state, the crafting of economic empires both legal and illegal, and innovative searches for peace.

Nordstrom describes the multi-trillion-dollar international financial networks that support warfare. She traces the entangled routes by which illegal drugs, precious gems, weapons, basic food supplies, and pharmaceuticals are moved by an international cast of businesspeople, profiteers, and black-market operators. Shadows of War demonstrates how the experiences of both the architects of war and of ordinary people are deleted from media accounts and replaced with stories about soldiers, weapons, and territory. For the first time, this book retrieves from the shadows the faces of those whose stories seldom reach the light of international recognition.

My Review:

We’ve all heard of the black market economy and often have negative views of it. Guns. Drugs. Classified military information. The black market is a place where the lowest of the low exist. However, common people purchase goods on the black market every day. The same ‘shadow economy’ sells that the knock-off version of the Louis Vuitton purse you’ve wanted but couldn’t afford, a bootleg DVD of a newly released film, and the marijuana that you don’t think should be illegal are all goods sold ‘underground’ and off the radar of taxation. In the public sphere these are probably not be things we admit to finding acceptable, but many people in their personal lives may have no qualms about purchasing. When posed with the situation of a woman unable to afford the drug company’s price for her life-saving medication most wouldn’t condemn her to death opposed to accepting that black market drugs may not always be negative. We just don’t call this the black market, but it is. And it exists because there is a demand for it.

Shadows of War is an ethnographic study into the world of this shadow economy and its relationship to people in conflict zones. Nordstrom discusses the results of ethnographic work in Angola, Mozambique, and Sri Lanka. The locations are different; the dependence on a shadow economy is the same. Many governments cannot afford the wars they support and often resort to trade in the black market. The same black market that Nordstrom says makes up about 30% of the American economy and pushing up to 80-90% in others. These are radical statements that do not go along with the long-held ‘normal’ discussions amongst economists. It is quite interesting that more people have not studied this phenomenon. Perhaps we don’t want to accept that such a world exists in such large proportions even within “first-world” nations. Many people also do not study conflict in active war zones. In my opinion, Carolyn Nordstrom is an incredibly brave woman and has conducted some of the most interesting research into the globalization and war profiteering.

Many people within war zones have had their entire lives interrupted and often find themselves in situations of life and death where purchasing goods through shadow networks becomes the only way to survive. Trans-national smuggling networks coordinate the transportation of goods and food into war zones, but often at the same time export illicit goods such as cocaine or stolen diamonds. These actions we may deem ‘negative’ are often overlooked for the ‘positive’ humanitarian aspect. Businessmen can weave their way in and out of the shadow economy. Our very own CIA has openly acknowledged they conduct clandestine activities. This is one example of “magicians” who can easily cross the interface from the “legal” approved and the “illegal” black economies and also have the ability to become “invisible” once again.

One of the most significant ideas I’ve gained from Nordstrom’s book is that those involved in the shadow network do not often fit within our value judgments of ‘good’ and ‘bad’, ‘moral’ and ‘immoral’. Nothing in this world is black and white. Everyday people living within war zones deal with hardships that I can only imagine (and Carolyn Nordstrom has been successful at creating this imagery). Therefore, it would not be acceptable of me to place judgments on the buying and selling of goods in circumstances that could mean survival or death of their families and community. Situations in which I may perhaps make the same decisions. To show what life is like in someone else’s shoes is precisely the purpose of ethnography- clearly this has been a successful one.

After completing Carolyn Nordstrom’s book, I feel obliged to say that this is the best book on war and war profiteering I’ve read since becoming an International Peace and Conflict Resolution student. Surviving war can be beautiful in the sense of love, hope and cooperation, but it can also be ugly for its cruelties and the reality of hard decisions that people have to make every day to support their families. In a conflict zone actions often become indecipherable in terms of ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Is the pilot who smuggles out diamonds from your village bad? What about if he is only one bringing much needed food and medicine into your village? Context changes everything. However, what if we elaborate more in this scenario and say the pilot in this story works for an NGO (a non-governmental organization). Nordstrom discusses how she saw this several times. What can you do? Can you even do anything? It is hard enough to convince people to volunteer in war zones. What if this pilot got fired from the NGO and sent home and nobody is willing to replace his position of flying shipments of aid through a war zone? Yet again, that changes things too. I’d be interested to learn what types of policies NGO’s have regarding this type of behavior. I can guess what they would be; however, I think it is implied that often people turn a blind eye to certain behaviors in the name of peacebuilding. Peacebuilding is an industry after all.

Besides my first true introduction to the immensity of the ‘shadow economy,’ the biggest thing I’ve taken from Nordstrom’s book is this game of labeling a country as ‘at war’ or ‘at peace.’ When is a country at peace? After the signing of a treaty? Certainly a piece of paper is meaningless to most people who live in a war zone and define reality as what people do, not what they say they will do on paper. Just as instances of peace arise on the battlefield, instances of war continue through into ‘peace’ time. Nordstrom makes it clear that the distinction of war and peace-times are not clear cut, and often when wars “start up” again it is indicative that the war had never really stopped in the first place.

She used to term ‘organizational scarcity’ to describe this game played that keeps people reliant on informal market goods. It is a great question of how to reestablish networks of formal economy that is affordable and accessible to everyone after a war ends. Many times this is not put into place and people have no choice but to rely on the only networks they know. Informal economies encourage exploitation in many ways and allow individuals to gain incredible amounts of power that they otherwise wouldn’t have. Is this one of the reasons why some countries are in a state of perpetual conflict?

Two AK-47 rifles are displayed for sale among other items in a shop in northern Iraq. Photo: Christoph Bangert for The New York Times

In her chapter “Peace,” Nordstrom discusses her experience with orphaned street children in Angola who lived in the storm drain. When discussing illusions that occur within war, one example is how these street children fit into the group of invisibles- undesired members of society that are encouraged to disappear. Homeless people exist in all cities in the world often fit into this category. We all know they exist, but pretend they don’t. It is very upsetting for sure. The people that need help the most, like orphaned children, often do disappear. Sometimes this means they get integrated into an underground community, and sometimes this means death. There is another group of invisible people and this is the many who do not flee their countries but remain to set up community centers, administer aid and health care, and the NGO workers who leave their homes to work in lower than ideal conditions in the service of others. When was the last time you saw them on the nightly news? “In a final curious irony; in crafting the parables of power that are “just so” and “as if” stories, in silencing the truths of violence, and in deleting indices of the vast profiteering that emerges from war and the suffering it exacts – the stories of hope, human dignity, and peace are deleted from formal accounting as well” (pg. 242).

Nordstrom’s book clearly illustrates that more studies of the global black market must be conducted; it is just too large and influential to be ignored any longer. Black market sales include things like slaves and animals, as well as encourages animal poaching, which are unethical, destructive, and illegal around the world. I am interested in the study of terrorism and what it is, how it is created and why is it spreading. When Nordstrom says that by declaring war on Al Qaeda we have declared war on the shadows she is absolutely correct. The United States has quite obviously had a difficult time fighting this type of enemy. If I had to guess I would say that our intelligence agencies are probably spending much more time learning about the intricacies of the shadow networks in regards to how Al Qaeda operates. If we are not spending time researching these types of trails then we surely will not get far in this “war against terrorism.” Military power means nothing if you cannot shut off the valves of money and weapons into terrorist organizations; deals that are obviously not being conducted in the ‘formal’ economy.

I highly recommend this book.